Saturday, December 21, 2019

The Transracial Adoption and the Multi-Ethnic Placement Act

Goals of the policy My policy I choose from, (â€Å"Administrative Policies†, n.d) the Multi-Ethnic Placement Act as Amended by the Inter-Ethnic Adoption Provision of 1996. It has to do with transracial adoption. The purpose of this policy is associated with the Department of Childrens Services, it strives to push the best enthusiasm of all children set in cultivate mind by avoiding segregation in the position of children on the support of race, color or national source. This objective might be met by selecting and distinguishing asset families that can best help these kids (â€Å"Administrative Policies†, n.d). Social Work Speaks According to Anastas Clark, (2012), 58% of the children in foster care are children of color other than white. Reading this section I came across a lot of laws and acts that led up to the Multi-Ethnic Placement Act. One was called the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act of 1974. Years later the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 came about. This act was made to â€Å" establish standards to ensure reasonable efforts prior to the removal of Indian children from their families whereas the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980 prioritized family preservation and permanency as major goals of child welfare† (Anastas Clark, 2012, p.148). The Multi-Ethnic Placement Act policy and the purpose of it is the same in the Social Work Speaks book. Anastas Clark, (2012) stated that it was to prevent people from discriminating against race, color andShow MoreRelatedThe Sixties Scoop in Canada4155 Words   |  17 Pagesbehaviour and adopt civilizationâ₠¬  (Titley, 1992, p.36). Segregated day and residential schools had failed to meet the goals of assimilation: most former students did not embrace the Euro-Canadian identity. The Parliamentary committee examining the Indian Act between 1946 and 1948 rejected the existing policy and proposed Critical Social Work, 2010 Vol. 11, No. 1 54 Alston-O’Connor instead the integration of young Indians into public schools (Titley, 1992). Concurrently, the Department of Indian

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.